View Full Version : Official Duke Nukem Forever Teaser Video
Jokerz
12-19-2007, 02:38 PM
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cWuteFLUPSY&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cWuteFLUPSY&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
I think this is the 5th preview/teaser video i've seen for this game in the last 8 years!! I bets are on another 1 year until a new preview and 3-5 years until it's finally released.
Sryden..,.
12-19-2007, 04:47 PM
Any game that's been in development this long is guaranteed to suck arse.
i also smoke when i work out lol, and i better be able to tip strippers and see some digital bewbz
Tippo
12-19-2007, 05:55 PM
Any game that's been in development this long is guaranteed to suck arse.
I hope Starcraft 2 doesn't apply to this. That's been in development for like 6 years on top of another 2 when it finally comes out.
I hope Starcraft 2 doesn't apply to this. That's been in development for like 6 years on top of another 2 when it finally comes out.
Unfortunatley I think it will. Blizzard has gone way downhill since they put 95% of their focus into WoW. SC2 looks like they just slapped a StarCraft mod onto WarCraft 3. The graphics look way too cartoony, the character models suck, and it looks like the gameplay will be too complex and cumbersome to be fun.
Sryden..,.
12-20-2007, 02:28 AM
Unfortunatley I think it will. Blizzard has gone way downhill since they put 95% of their focus into WoW. SC2 looks like they just slapped a StarCraft mod onto WarCraft 3. The graphics look way too cartoony, the character models suck, and it looks like the gameplay will be too complex and cumbersome to be fun.
My impression is that the single player will most definitely rock, but I think you're right about it being cartoony and cumbersome, meaning the multiplayer will likely pale in comparison to SC.
Tippo
12-20-2007, 03:06 AM
2v2 lost temple anybody?
Or zero clutter?
Sryden..,.
12-20-2007, 04:28 AM
2v2 lost temple anybody?
Or zero clutter?
My god, I played thousands of 2vs2 Lost Temple matches. Thousands.
Tippo
12-20-2007, 12:44 PM
My god, I played thousands of 2vs2 Lost Temple matches. Thousands.
yeah... yeah... I spent like 3 years doing that
imo, the cartoony looks isn't going to be a bad thing as long as the gameplay is worth it. if you ever went and compared warcraft I, warcraft II, or even starcraft graffix to other RTSs like Command and Conquer, Ages of Empire, and LOTR you'll find that it's very cartoony. Honestly, Warcraft III wasn't that bad except for the implment of 3 things: 1 heroes (overpowerd), small army limit (where's my 200 units from SC days?), and finally the Economy fluctuating with army size thing. I had a patch that changed units up to 200 and changed that economy so it wouldn't change and we had a blast. also hero's aren't all that powerfull when you have 200 units against one <(^_^<). i'm just hoping that SC2 won't turn out to be too complicated to play (so far it don't look that way). i have high hopes that bliz has learned from their mistakes of WC III and SC2 wont be a let down.
Tippo
12-20-2007, 12:57 PM
imo, the cartoony looks isn't going to be a bad thing as long as the gameplay is worth it. if you ever went and compared warcraft I, warcraft II, or even starcraft graffix to other RTSs like Command and Conquer, Ages of Empire, and LOTR you'll find that it's very cartoony. Honestly, Warcraft III wasn't that bad except for the implment of 3 things: 1 heroes (overpowerd), small army limit (where's my 200 units from SC days?), and finally the Economy fluctuating with army size thing. I had a patch that changed units up to 200 and changed that economy so it wouldn't change and we had a blast. also hero's aren't all that powerfull when you have 200 units against one <(^_^<). i'm just hoping that SC2 won't turn out to be too complicated to play (so far it don't look that way). i have high hopes that bliz has learned from their mistakes of WC III and SC2 wont be a let down.
It wont be too complicated. I'm sure we can make 100-200 (depending on cap) of one type of unite (like dragoons or hydralisks) and send them into a base and kill them all, like before. Well, before they make their super-ships. Did you SEE those things? Talk about overpowered.
i refuse to watch trailors and what not. i dont' want to get my hopes up too high nor do i want to lose hope. i'll stay as is for now with my fingers crossed. btw, since i owe sryden a starcraft game and i c typo and some others play it, anyone want to arrange a game of multiplayer starcraft? i play mainly BGH any more but i'll try to play any map.
Tippo
12-20-2007, 02:28 PM
Big game hunters ftw! <3 Sure sounds good.
Big game hunters ftw! <3 Sure sounds good.
Yes! Nothing like a 8 person ffa on bgh. We need to all get together and play some Brood War some time.
.meno.
12-20-2007, 03:15 PM
wow that looks kool.
i always loved DK.... this should be interesting
Dr. Acula
12-20-2007, 04:34 PM
If we're lucky Duke Nukem will be half as good as diakatana.....idiots.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.